|
|
Marmer Penner Inc. Business Valuators and Litigation Accountants 94 Cumberland Street, Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M5R 1A3 |
Written by Steve Z. Ranot
CA·IFA/CBV,
CFE Recognizing
One of the creations of the Income
Tax Act (“ITA”) is the Estate Freeze. This technique allows the taxpayer to limit
capital gains subject to eventual taxation.
Otto owns the shares of Opco which
are worth $500,000. Otto expects these
shares to continue to grow in value but dislikes the idea of paying capital
gains taxes. Otto knows that on his
death, he will be deemed to have sold his shares at fair market value
triggering a large capital gain if the shares continue to rise in value. Otto has an infant child. He decides to incorporate a holding company,
Holdco. He settles a trust for the
benefit of Junior. The trust subscribes
for the common shares of Holdco for $1.
Otto uses the provisions of section 85 of the ITA to transfer the
common shares of Opco into Holdco for $500,000 of preferred shares of
Holdco. The ITA allows this
transfer to occur on a tax-free basis as Otto has received fair market value
consideration, but none of it in cash, debt or other “hard” consideration. All future growth of Opco will now accrue to
its new common shareholder, Holdco.
Otto’s preferred shares of Holdco are redeemable and retractable at
$500,000, so his value is frozen at this amount. Only the common shareholders of Holdco will benefit from Opco’s
growth. Meanwhile, Otto has ensured he
may use the $500,000 lifetime capital gains exemption to avoid capital gains
tax on his shares. Similarly, Otto could have caused
Opco to swap his common shares for $500,000 of preferred shares and issue new
common shares to the trust set up for Junior.
This is done under the provisions of section 86 of the ITA. This achieves the same result as the example
above but without the need to incorporate a Holdco. In
both cases, the transferor is left with redeemable and retractable preferred
shares and the transferee has common shares with an initial nominal value as
all of the business value at date of transfer is effectively owed to the
preferred shareholder. The
existence of preferred shares does not guarantee that the common shareholders
received their shares by way of an estate freeze. However, the existence of preferred shares with frozen values as
evidenced by redeemable and retractable features is a strong indicator that an
estate freeze took place earlier.
Whether the common shares received by way of an estate freeze are
excluded as gifts is a legal matter to be discussed elsewhere. |